What do I “do” with due diligence?

by rickcolosimo on August 9, 2010

Here’s a recent post by Rick Colosimo in the Five-Minute General Counsel series on due diligence, with an even shorter short form due diligence request list than our own investor-based due diligence list.

One question we haven’t answered here yet is: what is the point of all this? Well, investors/acquirors have three main risks to consider: the risk that you have a plan that can’t be achieved, the risk that the present team can’t accomplish the plan, and the risk of some ugly problem that destroys value. Due diligence, the process, should be designed to uncover information that affects these risks, either in magnitude or probability. But that’s only part of the process, and it’s where many otherwise high-quality “advisors” get stuck.

You have to do something with the information you gather, or it’s close to a waste of your time (the only exception is “keeping the other side honest”). You can do three things with information you find: you can use it to decide to kill the deal (a major patent litigation is this kind of problem); you can change the price of the deal (inventory discrepancies or overly aggressive business model assumptions are good examples), or you can change the terms (founder IP transfers are a good example). Allocating risks to the other party is one very common way of changing the terms of the deal.

{ 0 comments }

Which kind of business are you building?

by rickcolosimo on August 8, 2010

I’ve often thought that there are two kinds of businesses: those that make money from providing more value to customers, and those that make money from providing less value to their customers.

This brief article describes 5 grocery store ripoffs. I’d add Trop50 to the list, as noted also in the comments here. Trop50 is Tropicana orange juice with half the sugar. Awesome, until you look at the label and realize they added water so it’s only 50% orange juice. And the last time I looked, they actually charged MORE per half gallon of half-juice than for a half-gallon of pure juice. Are their customers really so pressed for time that they can’t mix juice with water when it’s coming out of the fridge?

And this isn’t bashing — consider a twist: like many parents of young kids, I have a love-hate relationship with juice boxes. It’s not about crappy drinks anymore — you can get organic fruit/vegetable mixed juices at Costco easily enough. No, it’s that my kids drink 50/50 juice/water mix at home, but juice boxes come in 100% juice unless you buy junk.

What if Tropicana put their great juice in a 50-50 juice box, where I get more value because I can give my kids the drink I want and can’t readily mix it myself?

So that’s an anecdote. Walk around tomorrow with your eyes open and think about the companies you interact with: who gives you more value? Does Costco? It’s certainly part of their proclaimed brand identity (salmon story, anyone?).

Now, think back to the title of this post: which kind of business are you building? When you think about the sustainability of your business, do you see a future in which it becomes increasingly easier to deliver less and less to your customers? Or one in which the amount of value you deliver is limited only by your imagination? Is your business one in which you expect to disappoint customers regularly and so need to plan to ensnare new ones consistently? Or do you expect to keep your customers happy and seldom see them defect?

Which kind of business are you building? Tell us in the comments.

{ 0 comments }

Why do you need a Ranger Buddy?

May 6, 2010

My pal Rex [video link] just posted about teamwork, in the literal sense, over at Grootship. This struck me because the notion of having a ranger buddy was drilled into us in countless ways during Ranger School, not the least of which was doing lots and lots of pushups if you strayed too far from [...]

Read the full article →

Einstein on simplifying

April 12, 2010

Here is another quote that has often been paraphrased, and the recursive nature of that concept is particularly appealing in this context: It can scarcely be denied that the supreme goal of all theory is to make the irreducible basic elements as simple and as few as possible without having to surrender the adequate representation [...]

Read the full article →

To seek alpha, analyze managers, not funds

December 5, 2009

This WSJ article on identifying and analyzing mutual funds is interesting because of what’s not there. The article describes a new study by Fama and French, the prolific finance authors who continue to study the efficient market hypothesis and the effects of pretending it doesn’t exist. In short, the study tracked yet another big collection [...]

Read the full article →

Evaluate nonprofits by starting with the goal

November 11, 2009

This recent memo from the president of Guidestar.org moved way beyond the typical self-congratulatory non-news and sales announcements and started off with a bang: start with these two simple and profound questions: what is your organization’s mission and how are you trying to accomplish it? It’s amazing how many organizations can’t answer this. I read [...]

Read the full article →

What data is needed for an alternative fee structure?

June 16, 2009

We recently wrote about alternative fee structures for large law firms and their clients. A post from the WSJ law blog on Kirkland & Ellis’s foray into the field recognizes a point we’ve made before: some companies (and indeed, most law firms) don’t have good information about their usage of legal services. Without solid data-driven [...]

Read the full article →

Can buybacks make sense in a crisis?

June 9, 2009

Just recently, we published another post regarding stock buybacks and how the math is the math: you can change your risk profile, but in any case, at some point the usage of cash to buy stock makes sense as a low-cost way of returning value to shareholders. Sure, there are commentators who complain that a [...]

Read the full article →

More MSFT cash-usage ideas….

June 2, 2009

[NB: this post was started quite some time ago, and it recently re-surfaced in our 'drafts' folder. Sorry for the delay, but we believe that the underlying issues are still interesting and how companies use cash is more, not less, relevant in a turbulent economy.] Business Week ran a short piece profiling the investment analysis [...]

Read the full article →

$500 software bounty for Blackberry BCC tool (increased!)

April 2, 2009

Now that Rim is adding its own app store, titled “App World,” we’re renewing and increasing our earlier software bounty for a tool (plugin/patch/hack) that allows users of hosted BES to enable automatic BCC’ing of any address. Our original post described the features and functions, with an original bounty of $250. New Bounty: $500 (work-for-hire) [...]

Read the full article →